How U.S. Rejection of Climate Pacts Threatens Climate — And Hospitality

When Giants Step Back: How U.S. Rejection of Climate Pacts Threatens Climate — And Hospitality

---

U.S. Reversal: What We Know So Far

In 2025, the United States formally withdrew from the Paris Climate Agreement again, signaling a political and policy shift away from global climate cooperation. Le Monde.fr+2SAGE Journals+2

President Donald Trump has also publicly criticized multilateral climate policies. At the United Nations General Assembly, for example, he called climate change “the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world,” and emphasized prioritizing fossil fuel development over renewable energy mandates. Reuters

Additionally, the U.S. has exited or reduced commitments to international funds and mechanisms that compensate vulnerable nations for climate loss and damage. The Guardian These moves weaken collective climate governance and reduce incentives for lower-emitting nations to stay the course.

---

Scientific Implications of This Trajectory

• A 2025 scholarly article “The U.S. Withdrawal from the Paris Agreement — Implications for global climate governance and security” argues that U.S. exit increases the risk of “a domino effect,” where other nations loosen their climate targets, expecting less global pressure or fewer shared resources. SAGE Journals
• The research “Hospitality Industry 4.0 and Climate Change” shows that the hospitality sector can mitigate climate change by adopting advanced technologies (IoT, AI, robotics) to reduce energy usage, water consumption, and food waste. But these gains assume strong regulatory alignment and international norms for carbon emissions. PMC+1
• Studies like “A Global Assessment: Can Renewable Energy Replace Fossil Fuels by 2050?” assert that while renewables are progressing, the grid-scale shift away from coal, oil, and gas must continue at pace. If major emitters backtrack, it becomes far harder to keep global temperatures under 2°C or reach the ideal 1.5°C target. (These goals are foundational for avoiding worst-case climate impacts.) MDPI

---

What That Means for Hospitality

1. Increased Weather Risk & Operational Disruption

More extreme weather events are expected if climate policy weakens. Hotels and resorts in vulnerable zones (coastal, high-altitude, or wildfire-prone) may face flooding, storms, water shortages, or heatwaves. That means increased costs for damage repair, insurance, and risk mitigation.

2. Rising Costs & Resource Constraints

With fossil fuel-led policies, carbon pricing or penalties may be delayed, but resource scarcity (e.g. water, clean energy capacity) could become more acute. Energy costs may fluctuate wildly. Hotels could face rising utility bills, possible supply chain disruptions for food and fuel, and downtime during shortages.

3. Reputational & Market Risks

Modern travellers are increasingly conscious of sustainability. A hotel brand perceived as lagging in climate action may lose loyalty, especially among eco-minded guests. Green certification, carbon footprint transparency, and sustainable practices are becoming non-negotiable selling points. A shift away from climate agreements makes it harder to demonstrate trust and leadership.

4. Regulatory Risk & Policy Uncertainty

When a major country pulls back from climate pacts, international regulatory momentum can weaken. This may delay global carbon standards, fuel transition policies, and investment in renewables. For hospitality businesses investing in sustainable infrastructure (solar power, energy-efficient HVAC, water recycling), this could increase payback periods and investment risk.

5. Opportunities

Even in this scenario, there are silver linings:

• Hotels that lead in renewables and sustainability will stand out; these are differentiators in the market.
• Technology innovations—such as smart energy systems, water reclamation, and waste management—can help mitigate damage and reduce costs.
• Partnerships with local governments to build resilience (e.g. resilient infrastructures, green building codes) can position hospitality providers as community leaders.

---

Conclusion

The U.S.’s retreat from climate conventions and renewed emphasis on fossil fuels is worrying, not just politically or environmentally, but in very real operational terms for the hospitality industry. The science is clear: slowing climate action escalates risk. Hotels, resorts, and hospitality businesses must prepare, adapt, and lead. In South Africa and globally, those who invest now in sustainability, resilience, and green technologies will likely be the ones who thrive in the climate-shifting future.